Legal Opinion
McCann v. Communications Design Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 8, 1991No. Civ. B-89-164 (JAC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO RECUSE
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge:
Well after Plaintiff’s Motion for Recusal of Hon. José A. Cabranes (filed May 20, 1991) (“Plaintiff’s First Recusal Motion”) had been submitted for decision, and shortly before the court’s decision was to enter, the court received a letter from Attorney James J. Murray that raised new issues— issues that, in Mr. Murray’s view, “mandate [this court’s] recusal from the McCann case ... as a technical matter____” Letter from Attorney James J. Murray (dated June 25, 1991 and docketed June 27, 1991) (“June 25 Letter”).…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Richard R. SiblaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Pepsico, Inc., and Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Honorable Thomas R. McMillen Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wu v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Armenian Assembly of America v. Gerard CafesjianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Wu v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Madeline Apollo v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Doe v. Archdiocese of New Orleans Indemnity, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.