Legal Opinion

Colbert v. Rio Tinto

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 6, 2020No. 19-2711-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-2711-cv Colbert v. Rio Tinto UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Jackson v. Federal ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. Staehr v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative TradersSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. City of Pontiac Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement System v. UBS AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API