Colbert v. Rio Tinto
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
19-2711-cv Colbert v. Rio Tinto UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Jackson v. Federal ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Staehr v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative TradersSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- City of Pontiac Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement System v. UBS AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.