Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 4, 1919No. 10740PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. May 29, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The entire brief of the attorney for plaintiff in ei’ror is in one sentence as follows: “He insists on all the grounds of error set forth in his petition for certiorari, and says that the court erred on each and every ground thereof.” This is not an argument. It has been repeatedly held by this court and the Supreme Court of the State that assignments of error not argued in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error will be treated as abandoned. Cheek v. State, 22 Ga. App. 788 (5) (97 S. E. 203); Sulter v. State, 22 Ga. App. 105 (95 S. E. 532); Harbin v. Flannigan, 22 Ga. App. 30 (95 S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pelham Phosphate Co. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Cheek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Harbin v. FlanniganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Sulter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Townsend v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API