Legal Opinion

Nason v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1919No. Civ. No. 2759PublishedCited by 8 opinions

PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review an order of the Superior Court vacating the discharge of an administratrix. J. C. Rives, Judge. Order annulled. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Certiorari. By this proceeding petitioner seeks to have annulled an order vacating an order discharging Mabel A. Nason as administratrix of the estate of Cornelius Walker, deceased.

As appears from the petition, after a contest over heirship between Edwin N. Walker and E. Earle Walker (hereafter referred to for convenience as the Walker twins), and Mabel A. Nason, which contest was decided in favor of Mrs. Nason, the court settled the final account of the administratrix, and rendered a decree of distribution, awarding all of the property of the estate to Mrs. Nason. This decree was entered on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Carpenter v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1888
  3. In re the Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Odd Fellows' Sav. Bank v. DeupreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. In Re the Estate of ParsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Sheldon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Fredrickson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Tiffany Productions of California, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API