Bennett v. Day
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
The first question which the court will consider is whether or not the trial court erred in overruling the plea of the defendant to the jurisdiction of the court. At common law the status of a bastard was fixed and the rights of a bastard were few. Por a discussion of the progressive steps by which the laws of Georgia have alleviated the position of a bastard, we call attention to Hicks v. Smith, 94 Ga. 809 (22 S. E. 153), wherein the court said: “The status of the bastard as fixed by the common law, except as changed by statute, remains under our system of laws.” (Italics ours.) The right to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hicks v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Aiken v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Murphy v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Henderson v. ShiflettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Application of AshmoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Best v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Sims v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Boyd v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Queen v. JolleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.