Legal Opinion

(PS) Rogers v. Mountain Valley Unified School District

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 11, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02587Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ROGERS, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-02587-TLN-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 MOUNTAIN VALLEY UNIFIED (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 13, 14) SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Anthony Rogers and Roberto Romero are proceeding in this action pro 18 se.1 Pending before the Court are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ motion for 19 permission to e-file documents (ECF No. 8); (2) Plaintiffs’ motion to appoint guardian ad 20 litem (ECF No. 9); (3) Plaintiffs’ motion to appoint counsel (ECF…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States ex rel. Gardner v. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. La Dell Grizzell v. San Elijo Elementary SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API