Minturn v. Alexandre
District Court, S.D. New York
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
Choate, D. J.
This is a libel for collision. .The libel avers that there was laden at the port of Havana, on the British bark Helen, eertain sugars, “to be carried thereon to the port of New York and there safely delivered to your libellants, and bills of lading therefor duly signed by the master of said bark, naming tho libellants as consignees of said sugars.” The libel then avers in proper form the facts of the collision by which the vessel was sunk upon the voyage. It also avers “that by the collision your libellants have suffered damage in the value of said cargo $25,000.” An exception is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lawrence v. MinturnSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Fretz v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Cobb v. HowardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1856
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Ciuba v. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Indian Creek Coal & Mining Co. v. CalvertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Giguere v. E. B. & A. C. Whiting Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Brown v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.