Cott v. Baker
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mabshall, J.:
In this action, the plaintiff seeks to recover on a promissory note. Judgment was. rendered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.
An opinion in this case was filed March 11, 1922, but it has not been published. A rehearing was . granted on account of an error in the record of the judgment from which the appeal was taken. That record has been corrected by the trial court, and the judgment, as corrected, appears in another part of this opinion.
Defendants John H. Baker and J. F. Reel executed a promissory note payable to F. W.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bee Building Co. v. DaltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Sullivan v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Vertrees' Adm'r v. Newport News, Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
- St. Joseph & Denver City Railroad v. DrydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Wehe v. MoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Weber v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Henry v. EddeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Gideon v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
- Snider v. Sand Springs Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.