Legal Opinion

Eger v. Helmar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket No. 104, Calendar No. 38,422PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff, an infant, brought this suit .- by his next friend to recover damages for loss of the sight of his left eye alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant’s employee. In circuit court on trial by jury defendant had verdict and judgment was rendered thereon. Plaintiff has appealed.

Defendant, Helmar, as a contractor was building a residence for a Mr. Quinn in the city of Detroit. The street curb had to be cut or broken away for a driveway into the property. Defendant engaged Prank Lazone to do this work. Plaintiff claims that while breaking away the curb Lazone was…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Manzoni v. Detroit Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Gilson v. BronkhorstMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Lincoln v. Fairfield-Nobel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Martiniano v. BoothMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Baker v. Saginaw City Lines, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API