Legal Opinion

State v. Tinney

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 2012No. 2011 CA 41PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Tinney,

2012-Ohio-72.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellant Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J. -vs- Case No. 2011 CA 41 GLENN TINNEY Defendant-Appellee OPINION CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 92 CR 239 JUDGMENT: Affirmed in Part; Reversed in Part and Remanded DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: January 9, 2012 APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellant For Defendant-Appellee JAMES J. MAYER, JR. KARLA MARKLEY HALL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. CaraballoOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. EMC Mortgage Corp. v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. SteinkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. AquinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. BlalockOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. WoodyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API