Legal Opinion

Uzcategui v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bentley Kassal, J.

issue

Defendant seeks the name and address of each of plaintiffs’ expert witnesses who will testify at trial on the issue as to whether a certain product, manufactured by defendant and used by the infant’s parents, caused certain birth defects.

DECISION

Neither party cites a decision on "all fours”. Since CPLR *8693101 (subd [d], par 1) states that an expert opinion, prepared for litigation is not discoverable, absent exceptional circumstances, the question becomes whether the name of an expert to be used is discoverable, although his opinion is exempt.

Allen…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Uzcategui v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Avila v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API