Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ford Motor Co. v. Massey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1993No. 92-1153Published

1DissentSteele Hays, Justice

The existence of substantial evidence is a question of law. Fuller v. Johnson, 301 Ark. 14, 781 S.W.2d 463 (1989); St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. v. Braswell, 198 Ark. 143, 127 S.W.2d 637 (1939). Hence, it is incumbent on the members of this court to satisfy ourselves that this verdict of seven million dollars is based on more than speculation and conjecture.

We have said substantial evidence is “competent” evidence:

Substantial evidence has been defined as “evidence that is of sufficient force and character that it will, with reasonable and material certainty and precision, compel a conclusion one way…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ByarsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. v. Braswell, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Tigue v. Caddo Minerals CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API