Legal Opinion

State v. Silva

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1971No. 5064PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was convicted of a charge of sexual intercourse with a female under the age of sixteen years, HRS § 768-21. At a trial by jury the appellant sought to raise the defense of reasonable mistake of fact (as to the age of the female) as a question for the jury to consider. The trial court refused to give an instruction on this issue.

On appeal, appellant strongly urges upon this court that the better rule of law is to allow a defense of a mistake of fact concerning the age of the prosecutrix. In support of this position appellant cites the case of People v. Hernandez, 61 Cal. 2d 529,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. FulksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. MooreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  5. Territory of Hawaii v. Delos SantosHawaii Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Collins v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BuchHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. GuestAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. United States v. Guillermo Carlos-ColmenaresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API