Legal Opinion

Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 14, 1965No. C.D. 2528PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

Upon importation, certain so-called hinge-hanger bolts with nuts attached, which form the subject of the above-enumerated protest, were classified by the collector of customs as articles or wares, not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of iron or steel, in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and were assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem.

It is the contention of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smillie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Krueger v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. H. T. Kennedy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heads & Threads, Division of MSL Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. A. L. Liebman & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Ataka California, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Carmichael International Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Kurt Orban Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API