Hernandez-Espino v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Judge.
We granted Jose Herminio Hernandez-Espino’s application for interlocutory review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress crack cocaine found in his pocket during a search to which he consented. We agree with Hernandez-Espino that his consent to the search was tainted because it occurred during an unlawful second-tier encounter with law enforcement officers. Accordingly, we reverse.
“[T]he burden of proving a search was lawful is on the state. The state thus has the burden of proving the validity of a consensual search. Moreover, we are required to scrutinize…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- EWUMI v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Edenfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014