Legal Opinion

Hernandez-Espino v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 2013No. A13A1434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Judge.

We granted Jose Herminio Hernandez-Espino’s application for interlocutory review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress crack cocaine found in his pocket during a search to which he consented. We agree with Hernandez-Espino that his consent to the search was tainted because it occurred during an unlawful second-tier encounter with law enforcement officers. Accordingly, we reverse.

“[T]he burden of proving a search was lawful is on the state. The state thus has the burden of proving the validity of a consensual search. Moreover, we are required to scrutinize…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. EWUMI v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Edenfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API