Legal Opinion
State v. Michael Rosenfield
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 26, 2016No. 2015-080PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reiber, CJ.
¶ 1. Defendant appeals the denial of his motion, which requested that the trial court “correct the record” by amending his third driving-under-the-influence (DUI) conviction to appear as a DUI-1. Defendant filed the motion with the ultimate goal of reducing his conviction from a felony to a misdemeanor to reduce its collateral consequences. We affirm.
¶ 2. In 2005 and 2008, defendant was convicted of two DUIs that occurred while he was eighteen and twenty-one years old, respectively. In February 2014, defendant pleaded guilty to a DUI-3, which occurred when he was twenty-seven years…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weaver v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BoskindSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Greenmoss Builders, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Heisse v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matthew Gray and Erik Gray v. Martha Treder, John Muscarelle, Robert Muscarelle, Joseph Muscarelle, III, Anne Herrera, Edward F. Godfrey, Judith C. GodfreySupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- State v. Aaron CadySupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- State v. Jonathan VilleneuveSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- State v. Michael RosenfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- State v. Travis SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 2026