Lucas v. Sterling Oil & Gas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
Regulations issued by the Treasury Department, article 223 of Regulations 45, gave the taxpayer, under the Revenue Act of 1918, the option of charging certain expenditures in connection with oil and gas wells to capital or treating them as operating expenses. The manner in which the election was to be made was not specified, hut, once made, it was to control for all subsequent years. In appellee’s original return for 1919, made by an accountant in 1920, expenditures of this character' were charged to capital account. The return as thus made disclosed no taxable income.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rose v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
- McIntosh v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1929
- Sterling Oil & Gas Co. v. LucasDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1931
- Morris v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
3Cited by24 opinions
- Estate of Goodall v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Meyer's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Richardson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Denman Tire & Rubber Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Estate of Stamos v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.