Brown v. County of Suffolk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the County Clerk did not receive prior written notice of the alleged hazardous highway condition as required by Suffolk County Charter § C8-2A. Although both the Department of Public Works and the County Executive received prior written notice, such notice was insufficient because neither one of those departments was a statutory designee under Suffolk County Charter § C8-2A (see Gorman v Town of Huntington, 12 NY3d 275, 280 [2009]).
Although written notice would not be required if the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oboler v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gorman v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Forbes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Kiszenik v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Padula v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Smith v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012