Legal Opinion

Brown v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the County Clerk did not receive prior written notice of the alleged hazardous highway condition as required by Suffolk County Charter § C8-2A. Although both the Department of Public Works and the County Executive received prior written notice, such notice was insufficient because neither one of those departments was a statutory designee under Suffolk County Charter § C8-2A (see Gorman v Town of Huntington, 12 NY3d 275, 280 [2009]).

Although written notice would not be required if the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oboler v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Gorman v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Forbes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Kiszenik v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Padula v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Smith v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API