Legal Opinion

Mead v. Billings

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment (of $1,005.46) of the district court for Hubbard county, Holland, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, J.1

This action, being on the calendar of the district court for Hubbard county, was tried at the May term, 1888. The plaintiff had a verdict. Afterwards the defendant moved for a new trial, and this was allowed by order of the district court. From that order the plaintiff appealed to the supreme court. The cause was heard in this court at the April term, 1889. The order appealed from was affirmed, (40 Minn. 505, 42 N. W. Rep. 472;) and on the 10th day of June, 1889, the mandate of this court was issued, remitting the cause to the district court, and was filed in the latter court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mead v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edgington ex rel. Meyer v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Oswald v. MoranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Dr. Ward's Medical Co. v. WolleatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Colter v. LoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API