In re Duane S.

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Yuskevich, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated March 29, 2012, as, after a permanency hearing, continued the permanency goal of “placement for adoption” with regard to the child Duane S., Jr.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the petitioner met its burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the continuation of the…