Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Shankle

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1984No. 83CA0870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BABCOCK, Judge.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the insurance company defendants in a wrongful death action have a duty to distribute, or monitor distribution of, settlement proceeds to all potential beneficiaries under the Colorado wrongful death statute. We hold that there is no such duty.

Leila Shankle (Leila) filed a wrongful death action approximately six months after the accidental death of her husband. The action was settled in December 1980, by a $48,000 payment to Leila by defendants Hartford Accident and Fidelity Co., Western Casualty and Surety Co., Western Fire…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clint v. Stolworthy Ex Rel. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Howlett v. GreenbergColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Peck v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Whitley v. Georgia Western & Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dewey v. HardyColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Klancke v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Barnhart v. American Furniture Warehouse Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Mitson Ex Rel. Mitson v. AG Engineering & Development Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  5. Klancke v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API