Rich's, Inc. v. Townsend
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
We wish to commend counsel for both parties for their diligence in calling to the attention of this court over one hundred citations, including Code sections and decisions of the appellate courts concerning the sufficiency and deficiency as to whether or not a petition for damages based on negligence or lack of negligence is subject to demurrer. We will not attempt to discuss all of these cases brought to our attention. We think only a few cases are necessary in order for us to arrive at a decision. We are aware that a petition must be construed most strongly against the pleader. We call…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mandeville Mills v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Wynne v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Scott v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Holloman v. Henry Grady Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Samples v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Underwood v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Turner v. Sumter Self Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Wade v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Simpson v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Perton v. Motel Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.