Legal Opinion

Coupe v. Platt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1899PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Tort, for personal injuries. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Blodgett, J., the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff; and the defendant alleged exceptions, which appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

KíTOWLTOlT, J.

The question how far a host is liable to his guest for the unsafe condition of his premises, when he is visited upon an invitation, express or implied, merely in a social way, from considerations of friendship or for pleasure, is not raised by this bill of exceptions. The judge assumed in favor of .the defendant that the law of this Commonwealth is like that of England, where it is held that, in the absence of traps, neither the poor nor the rich are bound to change the conditions in which they are accustomed to live in order to furnish for their friends or guests, recipients of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Hart v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Wilcox v. ZaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Perkins v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Nash v. WebberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Wool v. LarnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API