Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Sandford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1828PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR to the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Sandford, as the indorsee of Boudinot, brought this action of assumpsit against Lambert, .as the acceptor of a bill of exchange, drawn by Hamilton in favour of Boudinot, cashier. The defendant, Lambert, pleaded, first, non-assumpsit; on which issue was joined. He pleaded, secondly, that the bill became the property of the hank of Vincennes by the blank endorsement .of Boudinot, cashier, and his delivery thereof to the bank; that the hank, owners of the bill, sued the defendant, Lambert, thereon; and after service of the writ, and after the defendant had pleaded, the parties appeared by their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Raborg v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Derwort v. LoomerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
  2. Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. TaffeIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Marsh v. LowIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Farmers & Mechanics' Bank v. RathboneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
  5. Jubilee Placer Co. v. HossfeldMontana Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API