Legal Opinion

Ritz Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co. v. Ditmars

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 15, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant from judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, ninth district, in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

In this action upon a promissory note the defendant set up as a defense that the note was given for the amount of plaintiff’s bill against defendant for accommodations furnished the defendant at plaintiff’s hotel; that the indebtedness was one of defendant’s employer, the United States Mail Steamship Company (or, as developed in the subsequent affidavits, the France and Canada Steamship Corporation); and that about the date of the note the plaintiff refused to permit defendant to remove his baggage from the hotel unless he made a payment on the bill; that the defendant, for the purpose of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dwan v. MassareneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Mitchell v. SchroederAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  3. Mitchell v. SchroederAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ritz Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co. v. DitmarsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API