Legal Opinion

New England Naturist Association, Inc. v. George

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided September 30, 1994No. 94-345-M.P., 94-348-M.PPublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on September 20, 1994, pursuant to an order that directed the parties to show cause why the issues raised by the petitioners should not be summarily decided. The defendants, the town of South Kingstown (town) and intervenor Donna Mal-tempo, challenged a Superior Court judgment that reversed a decision of the South Kingstown zoning board. The zoning board had determined that the New England Naturist Association, Inc. (NENA, plaintiff), requires a special exception in order to utilize its beachfront property.

After reviewing the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Town of Narragansett v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

4Cited by89 opinions

  1. Abbaticola v. Narragansett Zoning Board of Review, 97-0357 (1999)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  2. All Saints Church in Pontiac v. Ruggieri, 99-0663 (2000)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  3. Anderson v. AlexandreSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. Bailey v. Warwick Zoning Board of Review, 96-229 (1997)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  5. Bellini Construction Co., Inc. v. the Zoning Board of Review, 96-2722 (1998)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1998

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API