Portsmouth Cotton Oil Refining Corp. v. Madrid Cotton Oil Co.

The report of this case on a former appeal — to be found in 195 Ala. 256,. 71 .South, 111 — gives a sufficient statement of the case for the purposes of this appeal. On the former appeal it was said:

“This record shows beyond doubt that appellant did purchase, through Hewitt, and on the terms, named, and that appellee declined to sell or ship on those terms, after demand by appellant; that the price of oil was higher, at the time for delivery, than it was at the time of the-alleged sale by appellee to appellant; and that the latter went into the market and purchased the oil at an advanced…