Fine Associates v. Board of Trustees of Elmsford
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The petitioners’ contention that the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Elmsford (hereinafter the Board) violated the procedural and substantive requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art 8) (hereinafter SEQRA), is without merit. The Board, as lead agency, took the requisite hard look at the relevant environmental concerns involving the proposed zoning amendment and made a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its finding that the rezoning action would have no significant environmental effects (see, Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 571; 6 NYCRR 617.6 [g]…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Akpan v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Asian Americans for Equality v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Gaona v. Town of Huntington Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Golden Triangle Associates v. Town Board of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Cellular Telephone Co. v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. v. Town Board of the Town of CoeymansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Hejna v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hejna v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.