Legal Opinion

Rouse Ex Rel. Rouse v. Snead

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1967No. 201PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The defendant has assigned errors based on numerous exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence. Examination of each exception fails to reveal error of substance. The evidence was conflicting as to the defendant’s speed, as to whether the lights on the plaintiff’s vehicle were visible to approaching traffic, and as to the position of the disabled vehicle at the time of collision. The evidence was sufficient to permit the jury to find the Oldsmobile was well lighted, notwithstanding the motor was dead. The evidence of defendant’s speed, the skidmarks, and failure to avoid striking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Short v. Chapman Ex Rel. RhoneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Rodgers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Rosser v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Peeden v. TaitSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Holland v. MalpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warren v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. U.S. Industries, Inc. v. TharpeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Thomas v. DeloatchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Warren v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API