Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scherer v. Volusia County Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 7, 2015No. 1D14-2205Published

1DissentRay, J.

Because I conclude that subparagraph 112.18(l)(b)4 renders Appellant ineligible for the presumption of occupational causation for both dates of accident, I respectfully dissent.

To be entitled to the rebuttable presumption of occupational causation in paragraph 112.18(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2013), which provides that a heart condition like Appellant’s is presumed to be the result of *141an accident in the line of duty, a claimant * is required under subparagraph 112.18(l)(b)4 to “make” a claim for benefits prior to or within 180 days after leaving the employment of the employing agency. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Brown v. LP SANITATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Ocean Reef Club, Inc. v. WilczewskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Seminole County Sheriff's Office v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API