Scherer v. Volusia County Department of Corrections
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentRay, J.
Because I conclude that subparagraph 112.18(l)(b)4 renders Appellant ineligible for the presumption of occupational causation for both dates of accident, I respectfully dissent.
To be entitled to the rebuttable presumption of occupational causation in paragraph 112.18(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2013), which provides that a heart condition like Appellant’s is presumed to be the result of *141an accident in the line of duty, a claimant * is required under subparagraph 112.18(l)(b)4 to “make” a claim for benefits prior to or within 180 days after leaving the employment of the employing agency. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Brown v. LP SANITATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Ocean Reef Club, Inc. v. WilczewskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Seminole County Sheriff's Office v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005