Legal Opinion

Vitti v. Garabedian

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 28, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The first action is to recover for labor performed and materials furnished in excess of the contract price for which the plaintiff agreed to build a single dwelling house and garage for the defendant. There was evidence warranting the findings by the trial judge, that the plaintiff did much extra work as shown by the account annexed to the declaration, the fair value of which was $1,888.26. The contract however contained the following provisions:

Deviations from Drawings, etc.

No deviation from the drawings and specifications shall be made in the execution of the work without the written…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. StanchfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Trevas & Schack, Inc. v. Napel Mills Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zarthar v. SalibaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. M. L. Shalloo, Inc. v. Ricciardi & Sons Construction, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. National Overall Dry Cleaning Co. v. YavnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Creative Marine, Inc. v. ZaccaiMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API