Clate v. Clate
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Where a parent, in a petition seeking a modification of child support, asserts the child’s right to receive adequate support, ’’the test is whether petitioner has shown a change of circumstances warranting an increase in the best interests of the child” (Matter of Sutton v Sutton, 178 AD2d 980; see also, Matter of Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132, 141; Matter of Michaels v Michaels, 56 NY2d 924). Family Court properly applied the Brescia test to petitioner’s modification petition, rather than the more stringent test set forth in Matter of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Boden v. BodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Michaels v. MichaelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sutton v. SuttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hughes v. WasikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Neil v. NeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996