Legal Opinion

Singleton v. Polster

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1935No. 2439PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT

' The pleadings raised the" issues of the negligence of the defendant, contributory-negligence of the plaintiff'and injuries to the plaintiff. A" general verdict was returned for the defendant. Counsel have provided the court with-comprehensive and helpful "briefs, which we have considered in conjunction with the reading of the record.

Error is prosecuted by the plaintiff, who" claims that she was in the employ of the defendant and that at the time when she was. injured she was obeying a peremptory order to assist the defendant in getting from her garage in her machine and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harper v. McQuownOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Crawford v. TarvinOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API