Legal Opinion

State v. Albarran

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2016No. 92775-8PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCloud, J.

¶1 A jury found Miguel Albarran guilty of several crimes, including second degree rape of a child (in violation of RCW 9A.44.076) and second degree rape (in violation of RCW 9A.44.050(l)(b)), based on a single act. At sentencing, the parties and the trial court all agreed that the rape and child rape convictions violated double jeopardy protections. U.S. Const, amend. V; Wash. Const, art. I, § 9. The remedy for a double jeopardy violation is vacation of the conviction for the lesser offense; here, the trial court concluded that the lesser offense was second degree child rape and vacated that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. DanforthWashington Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Grocery Mfrs. Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. NumrichWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State Of Washington v. Benjamin J. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. State Of Washington v. Corey Alexander VentarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Edward WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API