Legal Opinion
United States v. Litvin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 6, 1973No. Crim. 1928-72PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FLANNERY, District Judge.
The defendants in this case are charged pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 331 (k) (1970) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act which prohibits “[t]he alteration, mutilation, destruction, obliteration, or removal of the whole or any part of the labeling of, or the doing of any other act with respect to, a food, drug, device, or cosmetic, if such act is done while such article is held for sale (whether or not the first sale) after shipment in interstate commerce and results in such article being adulterated or misbranded.” Specifically, the defendants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Thriftimart, Inc., a Corporation, Dba Smart & Final Iris Co., Gil P. Stewart, Wm. Todd, Sr., and Robert D. Jensen, IndividualsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Woods & Rohde, Inc. v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Youghiogheny and Ohio Coal Company v. MortonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1973
- United States v. Jamieson-McKames Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. New England Grocers Supply Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980
- United States v. Roux Laboratories, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.