Legal Opinion

Porter v. Sigler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 15, 1848PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error., to Henry District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Greene, J.

This was an action in the district court against the indorser of a promissory note. The record in a previous suit against the maker of the note was introduced, to show that a continuance had been granted by consent of parties, in order to affect the question of diligence. The court in this case admitted parole proof to explain why the continuance was had “ by consent,” as stated in the record, by showing that the cause could not have been reached for trial at that term of the court. This admission of parole proof was objected to, and is assigned as error; upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cave ex rel. Wallace v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  2. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1839
  3. Olmsted v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1810
  4. Wittstein v. HuntsmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. PrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Roberts v. . PrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API