Legal Opinion

McCammon v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

.Error to íngham. (Person, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

After the decision in 66 Mich. 442, defendant took a new trial under the statute, at which the plaintiffs again recovered judgment. In the chain of title shown by the plaintiffs upon the trial, the record of two deeds-was introduced, to each of which the defendant objected, upon the ground that the deeds were not properly certified to entitle them to record. The original deed executed by the sheriff of Ingham county upon a foreclosure sale by advertisement was also introduced, under objection and exception. The defendant introduced no evidence, and the-court directed a verdict for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Brown v. CadyMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. McCammon v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson Bridge & Iron Co. v. Lancashire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Britan v. Straus Bros. & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Bass v. Federal Land BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API