Honeysett v. the White Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
Plaintiff has judgment for commissions. The defense was that the commissions had not been earned, and accord and satisfaction. On the facts found and on the undisputed evidence judgment should have gone the other way.
Plaintiff was employed at a salary of $250 a month and specified rates of commission on motor trucks sold by him. In consequence of a difference between him and defendant, he tendered his resignation on October 12 to take effect October 31. The defendant declined to accept the resignation and under a clause in the contract, discharged him on October 16. He had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Washington N. Gas Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Ziegler v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Christman v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Crescent Corrugated Paper Products Co. v. Weaver Paper Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lucacher v. KersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Blaisdell Filtration Co. v. Bayard & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Purvis v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Goldenstern & Cohen, Inc. v. Butler Iron & Steel Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1943
- Rutz v. Hoffower, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cameron County1940