Legal Opinion
Adames v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 11, 1990No. CV-88-0721PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SIFTON, District Judge.
This action was originally brought by the individual plaintiffs, Oneida Adames, Mir-sada Krlic, Nancy Farinola, and Lisa Poggi, to redress alleged employment discrimination on the basis of race, descent, ancestry, and ethnic characteristics by the defendant, the Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd. (the “Bank”). Plaintiffs’ original cause of action was based on 42 U.S.C. § 1981, with jurisdiction predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1343(4). On April 29, 1989, this Court granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs’ motion for certification of a class under Federal Rules…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eric H. Deravin, III v. Bernard Kerik, Commissioner, and New York City Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Robins v. Max Mara, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1992
- Long v. Marubeni America Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- U.S. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Phase 2 Invs. Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.