Riley v. State Bank of De Pere

Upon this appeal, the defendant contends that it is not liable and the judgment is erroneous for the following reasons: (1) That its liability was discharged by payment of the sum into court pursuant to judgment in garnishment in aid of execution against Edward Riley; (2) that in the event that garnishment proceeding is void, it is subrogated by the payment to the rights of the mortgagees; *20(3) that it is protected by the judgment against the deposit entered after payment into court in the second garnishment action; (4) that the right of the plaintiff to recover is suspended because of the…