Legal Opinion

Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc. v. Butler

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 5, 2001No. 1000758 and 1000809PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

816 So.2d 9 (2001)

ALLIED-BRUCE TERMINIX COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a Terminix Service; and Billy Murphy

v.

Richard BUTLER and Hiltrud Butler.

Robert E. Ritz and Wendy Jean Ritz

v.

Richard Butler and Hiltrud Butler.

1000758 and 1000809.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 5, 2001.

T. Julian Motes and Michael E. Gabel of Sirote & Permutt, P.C., Mobile; and Edward M. Price, Jr., and Joel W. Weatherford of Farmer, Price, Hornsby & Weatherford, Dothan, for appellants Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc., d/b/a Terminix Service, and Billy Murphy.

William L. Lee III and William W. Nichols of Lee & McInish Attorneys,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Harwood; Concurrence · See.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Sisters of Visitation v. COCHRAN PLASTERING CO. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte NapierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Ex Parte DyessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Stamey v. EasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. LarkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Southern Foodservice Management, Inc. v. American Fidelity Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Providian Nat. Bank v. ScrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Allied Williams Companies, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Long Excavating & Recycling, LLC v. Bates Hewett & Floyd Insurance Agency (CONSENT)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API