Legal Opinion

Gerald v. Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 28, 1986PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion below, 201 N.J.Super. 438 (1985). Accordingly, we hold that a sex offender, sentenced under Title 2A to the Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center (ADTC) for offenses committed prior to the effective date of the Code of Criminal Justice (Code), N.J.S.A. 2C:1-1 to :98 — 4, shall, if released from treatment at ADTC, be treated for purposes of parole eligibility and release in the same manner as and in accordance with the standards applicable to a sex offender sentenced under the Code. We hold…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. State v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. In Re Parole Application of TrantinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Leamer v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Leamer v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. Artway v. Attorney General of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  4. State v. CruzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. State v. WhiteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API