Legal Opinion

Pullman Co. v. Roos

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The plaintiff below, defendant in error here, recovered a judgment against the defendant, The Pullman Company, on account of th'e loss of a sum of money amounting- to $190, alleged to have been taken by the porter on a car of The Pullman Company from a berth which was or had been occupied by the plaintiff and his wife at or immediately preceding the / time that the money was taken. After reciting the corporate power of The Pullman Company and the nature of its business, the amended petition contains the following allegations :■

“Plaintiff further says that on or about May Í2th, 1911, he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. New York Sleeping Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Bonser v. Pullman Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tomle v. New York Central RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API