Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Husik

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided November 7, 1946No. 1130Published

1Opinion of the Court

Crumlish, J.,

This is before us on a petition and rule to show cause why an appeal from a magistrate’s judgment in an eviction proceeding should not be quashed. To the petition, defendant filed an answer; subsequently plaintiff filed an amended petition, defendant an amended answer; plaintiff has also submitted depositions in support of the averments contained in his petition.

Defendant-appellant is the tenant in possession, and plaintiff-petitioner the owner, of the premises 455 West Roosevelt Boulevard, Philadelphia. On September 13, 1946, the magistrate rendered a judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curry v. Bacharach Quality Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Hess v. Vinton Colliery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Anania v. SerentaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Bluestone v. DeroySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Hangelias v. DawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API