Daniels v. Morris
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Lee District Court. Action to recover forty acres of land. There was a judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRotiirock, J.
l. HOMEtsSunenMu mü nmriiase: conveyance, The material facts in the case are as follows: One Nathan N. Eoster was the owner of the land in controversy, and resided .thereon, and occupied the same . , x as ^1S “ome. He had separated from liis lawful an<^ without being divorced, he intermarried one Jane Berry. Afterward, and while *370living separate and apart from both of said women, lie intermarried. with the plaintiff, representing himself to be unmarried. The plaintiff entered into said marriage in good faith, believing Foster to be an unmarried man, and resided upon the land with him as his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
3Cited by18 opinions
- Davis Ex Rel. Grant v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Winter v. WinterNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
- In Re the Marriage of TierneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Luedecke v. LuedeckeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.