Legal Opinion
United States v. Dimmick
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 22, 1901No. 3,926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Criminal Prosecution. On motion for new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
DE HAVEN, District Judge.
The defendant was indicted for the violation of section 5492 of the Revised Statutes, and convicted. The section is as follows:
“Every person who, having moneys of the United States in his hands or possession, fails to make deposit of the same with the treasurer, or some assistant treasurer, or some public depository of the United States, when required so to do by the secretary of the treasury, or the head of any other proper department, or by the accounting officers of the trea'sury, shall be deemed guilty of embezzlement thereof.”
The question now presented for…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Duhamel v. Port Angeles Stone Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Wash. Local Etc. v. Internat'l Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Washington Local Lodge No. 104 of International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders & Helpers v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders & HelpersWashington Supreme Court · 1947