Legal Opinion

N. O. Nelson Manufacturing Co. v. Benjamine

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 5, 1934No. 4-3570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is a suit by appellant to enforce a materialman’s lien, and there appears to be no substantial conflict in the testimony, which is to the following effect: F. P. Pierce, operating as Pierce Lumber Company, was engaged in the retail lumber business, and in connection with that business sold building supplies, much of which he had bought from appellant over a period of several years. These supplies were sold on an open account, which appears to have been mutually satisfactory. The lumber company was regarded as a good customer. J. W. McLeod was the appellant’s traveling salesman and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Bedding Co. v. AndesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Lovett v. Eastern Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. A. J. Chestnut Co. v. HargraveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. McMillan v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. City of Orlando v. GilesSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Landmark Savings Bank v. Weaver-Bailey Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Reserve Loan Life Insurance v. ComptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Bradley Advertising, Inc. v. Froug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API