Legal Opinion

CITY AND CTY. OF HONOLULU v. AS Clarke, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1978No. 6124PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

OGATA, J.

This is an eminent domain action brought by plaintiffappellee City and County of Honolulu (City). The complaint names eleven defendants, including defendant-appellant A. S. Clarke, Inc. (Clarke). The City moved for summary judgment against Clarke and two other defendants. Clarke opposed the motion on the ground that it was entitled to compensation from the City due to its (Clarke’s) asserted leasehold interest in the subject property.

The court below granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, thus dismissing any and all claims which Clarke and the two other…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stockton Harbor Industrial Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Abraham v. S. E. Onorato GaragesHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hawaiian Gas Products v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  4. Technicolor, Inc. v. TraegerHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hing Bo Gum v. Mataichi NakamuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Knaefler v. MackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re the Estate of Shunji Kay IkutaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re Kiki, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1984
  4. In Re the Estate of Shunji Kay IkutaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In re KIKI, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API