Greene v. Mobley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Memminger, J., York, Fall term, 1918. Action by G. H. Greene against H.- G. Mobley, and another. Decree for defendant and plaintiff appeals. submits: The deed was void under .the Statute of Elizabeth: 12 R. C. L., p. 492; 30 Cyc. 420; 30 S. C. 431; 97 S. C. 261; 11 S. C. ; Ency. P. & Pr„ vol. XXI, pp. 70, 76; 20 Cyc. 746; 26 S. C. 175; Code 1912, vol.
Read the full summary
Before Memminger, J., York, Fall term, 1918. Action by G. H. Greene against H.- G. Mobley, and another. Decree for defendant and plaintiff appeals. submits: The deed was void under .the Statute of Elizabeth: 12 R. C. L., p. 492; 30 Cyc. 420; 30 S. C. 431; 97 S. C. 261; 11 S. C. ; Ency. P. & Pr„ vol. XXI, pp. 70, 76; 20 Cyc. 746; 26 S. C. 175; Code 1912, vol. I, sec. 3455; 64 S. C. 364; 27 S. C. 286; 56 S. C. 154; 20 Cyc. 300; 66 S. C. 172; 52 S. C. 472; 20 Cyc. 439, 453; 82 S. C. 104; 65 S. C. 105; 56 S. C. 240. Even if actual or moral fraud had not been established, it zvas not necessary as…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
The case shows:
“This is an action to set aside a deed as fraudulent under the Statute of Elizabeth, and was commenced by service of summons and complaint December 7, 1917. The complaint alleges, in substance, that the defendant, H. G. Mobley, became indebted to plaintiff, G. H. Greene, on February 5, 1916, in sum of $2,422.87, as evidenced by a promissory note given on that day, due February 5, 1917; that on September 10, 1917, after debt became due and while plaintiff was pushing for payment of the same, H. G. Mobley transferred to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Braffman v. GloverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
3Cited by1 opinion
- Newton v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953