Legal Opinion

Kinsler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 12, 2001No. 5D99-2669PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

AFFIRMED. See Augsberger v. State, 655 So.2d 1202, 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (holding that trial court did not abuse discretion in denying motion to continue for purposes of hiring private counsel on eve of trial where defendant had several months to do so and failed to articulate sufficient reasons for his dissatisfaction with appointed counsel); see also Ball v. State, 758 So.2d 1239, 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“[t]his is not a case in which the evidence shows no more than that [the defendant] and others were simultaneously found in proximity to illegal drugs”); Salyers v. State, 705 So.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Augsberger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Ball v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Kirkman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Salyers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State, Agency for Health Care Admin. v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API